Integrity

M both leaders throughout history crap set heights ethic and good standards for their countries and themselves. on that point direct been separates who did or verbalize some(prenominal)thing and e actu totallyything to loll what they want. They cast off set goals or objectives for their country without any thought or standards on achieving their goals. We have to ask ourselves, Do the completions justify the means? In other words, do the end results of a situation show what was butt end the situation? The ends do justify the means of lawfulness. Integrity is genius of the most important and construe words in the world. at that place are two kinds of equity, moral and intellect. In politics however, intellectual one is the more common land of the two types. There are a few flock who we know who had no moral or intellectual integrity. These large number were Adolf Hitler, Stalin, and Bush. Adolf Hitler had very high goals but did not have any integrity to complete it what so ever. He completed his goals (which were to buy the put forward Ger slicey power) by taking a way only the Jews rights nipping by little. After doing so, he made violent acts against the Jews and took all their money and attempted to kill them all. Hitler had no moral integrity because he did not choose to be trustworthy, honest, or consistent.

another(prenominal) man who had high goals but low integrity was Stalin. He was cold, harsh, and impersonal. leaders like Stalin got the government to take over every locution of public and private life. Stalins goal was to bring his countrys scotch do dge up. He had no moral integrity because h! o his harshness. chairman Bush wanted to stop terrorism in the unite States so he lied that he had undeniable trial impression that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. He had low moral... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper