Troublemaking Interpretations of Horation Ode Essay -- Horation Ode

Troublemaking Interpretations of Horation Ode There exists fence in of how one is to read Marvells Horation Ode, One of the most unexamined issues in the three essays, tho one which seems to be a presupposition for most of the argumentation that goes on mingled with both parties, is suffers cargonful caveat early in his essay that his chore is not to reveal triumphantly that what it Marvells poem really says is something quite opposed to what we feel supposed it to be saying (Ode 323). For Bush, what the poem is supposed to have say is key, for his argument will rest around such suppositions and commonalities, or simple readings as he might treat it and among his final arguments will be that Marvells poem means what it says (348), which will be arrived at by look at the poem in its common and natural sense(341). only Brooks is not necessarily strict in sticking to conventional interpretation, so it is intriguing he would begin with what we might call at this point an int erpretational warning label to insure that the reader does not interpret him and think that he is trying to merely find a smart interpretation for an old poem. While he will later cope that the New Critic is indeed in debt to the historicist, and we might accept this initial warning as a part of that debt to proper norms (326), it is with other interests in mind that Brooks ends his Notes on the Limits of narration and the Limits of Criticism. Invoking Matthew Arnold, Brooks concludes his essay dealing with Leslie Fielders call to interpret literature in relation to the rest of mans concerns (qtd. in Limits 354). To this, Brooks is in hearty agreement (Limits 354), and with this ending it is clear that there are ... ...es so many of his criticisms of Brooks in terms of how he looks for dread(a) solutions that stray from a common sense reading of the poem. This idea that the pillow slip of critic that Brooks advocates makes anxiety for the type of interpretation established b y a historical reading of the poem raises such questions as the eccentric of the critic in a society, and whether this critic is obliged to make trouble or not, and who is to be the focus of his troublemaking energies. Works Cited Brooks, Cleanth. Criticism and Literary History Marvells Horation Ode. tell apart Handout ENG 415. April 9th, 1996. Notes on the Limits ofHistory and the Limits of Criticism. Class Handout ENG 415 April 9th, 1996. Bush, Douglas. Marvells Horation Ode. Class Handout ENG 415. April 9th, 1996. Butler, Judith. Gender Trouble. New York Routledge, 1990.