Philosophy

In The Morality of Happiness , Annas explains that morality in ancient times was non socially imposed hardly one after another derived as a consequence of in-person consideration fast an unfilled purpose-driven life (Annas 27 She uses Aristotelian h wizardst to plash up this bring in . This will guide , not wall but explain Annas s representation of Aristotle s of moral philosophy . Every view of Aristotle that is presented in the body of this essay is Annas s view of Aristotle Assuming that Annas is change by reversal in her explanation of Aristotle , the concluding paragraphs of this essay will curtly address some of the implications of Aristotle s ethicsAccording to Aristotle , honourable considerations be not for every(prenominal) ace morals begins as a quest for a better life . Those who be satisfied with their lives or lack the ability to ponder on their lives hatfulnot strike in the considerateness that is necessary for service . spring chicken masses cannot hold in ethics because they engender lived enormous enough to be able to reflect on their accomplishments . too , slew who are so busy with their lives or do not collapse the opportunity for leisure cannot wage in ethics because they do not have the time that is inevitable for reprimand . Ethics is not for such people . For people to practice or remove in honorable activeness , tierce things moldiness occur . First , people should be disgruntled with their lives . This may seem a rather singular way to get a line at ethics , but those who are satisfied with their lives cannot guide in ethics , at least not in the sense of ancient ethics secondly , dissatisfied people must require to improve their conditions disgruntled people can not be complacent most their situations if they are to engage i n what passes for ethical activities . Third! ly dissatisfied people should reflect on ways of living that may be considered improvement over their present conditions . Their reflections should be apt in to bound for ethical .

Only individuals who fulfill these three criteria can engage in and benefit from the objective of ethical . Ethical would have no force for people who do not engage in such reflection on a personal level (Annas , p29The purpose of ethical reflection is not to scarce know what to do Ancient ethics is not to the highest level knowing what to do . It is more about acting on knowing what to do . The teleos (end ) or ending of ethical reflection is to act sensiblely upon what is known from the reflection . In Aristotelian ethics , it would not be ethical to act on feelings - desires or emotions - without reason . To do so would not be ethical More importantly , the cerebral reflection must not be just for any(prenominal) objective it must be direct at achieving the teleos of one s lifeSo , in Aristotle s view , there is a way that one goes about implementing this knowledge obtained from self-directed rational reflection . The implementation must be based on deliberate choices or actions Deliberate acting is necessary because it is the scarce kind of human...If you want to get a full essay, stray it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper